The human element of cybersecurity is simultaneously the most effective tool in your risk management toolbelt and the most complex to manage. Your staff can be your most robust early warning system, or the entry point for a disastrous cyberattack.
How you manage your staff and their approach to cybersecurity dictates your organization’s resilience. Let's explore why.
Some cybersecurity practitioners approach security safeguards with the fallacious belief that implementing defense-in-depth security infrastructure is sufficient to protect an organization. Thankfully, that mindset is gradually becoming extinct because the data refutes it.
Experts project the global cybercrime market will cost businesses $10.5 trillion in 2025, with cybercriminal income representing a significant portion. Cybercriminals are very financially motivated to grow their criminal enterprises and wreak havoc.
Humans are the No. 1 attack vector for cyberattacks. They’re especially susceptible to social engineering tactics, which play on human psychology to gain access to an environment to execute an attack.
Technology alone is insufficient to address this most critical vulnerability, and failing to effectively address the human element of cybersecurity is downright reckless in 2024.
If anticipating and managing human vulnerabilities was easy, it wouldn’t be a multibillion-dollar industry projected to grow exponentially in the next few years. The reason for that difficulty is how hackers exploit human vulnerabilities.
Technical exploits tend to be primarily binary, which means the exploit will occur in the ideal conditions and otherwise will not happen.
That principle also accounts for things like detection and response solutions and other mitigating infrastructure. A successful attack can overcome the attack surface boundary, which is why most organizations substantially harden their attack surface. If an attacker can’t get in, they won’t wreak havoc.
Social engineering attacks tend to be more complex.
Humans pose a unique gap in the attack surface due to their complex needs and motivations:
Social engineering attacks — which substantially predate modern cybersecurity — take advantage of these factors. While these attacks have changed with the rise of digital technologies, the solution has stayed relatively consistent over time. Training can make people more aware of the confidence tricks leveraged in social engineering and teach them to be savvier against them. However, remember that while training is the most effective solution, it doesn’t eliminate the risk of attacks — it only mitigates them.
Situational awareness is another factor that impacts training. Some people can extrapolate from abstract concepts and apply them in novel ways. For example, they may naturally understand how the information they learn about social engineering approaches in the corporate environment relates to their everyday work without much guidance.
Others must have specific situations explained to them. For example, while phishing and vishing are nearly identical and differ only based on email versus voice delivery, your team members may need explicit training on handling both situations. Different learning styles, including neurodivergence, can make it challenging to choose the most effective training.
The same considerations apply to the technical components of cyberattacks. System compromise may be primarily opaque to most users. If people notice anything amiss, it may be the inability to access files or specific resources, system slowness, or other odd behavior. They may dismiss these as “technological problems," which is why you need to educate staff on:
Everyone has a different cybersecurity awareness level. While this natural variation can present additional challenges in staff training, it can also create opportunities for bolstering your security posture.
Here's a simple example. While people can use general situational awareness to understand social engineering attacks as a whole, they may miss explicit triggers. Those who need more targeted training experience the opposite situation, where they overlook generic tactics but notice specific details.
This overlapping awareness can provide substantial in-depth defense against social engineering attacks. The challenge comes in cultivating this defense, which typically requires a complete shift in your organization's approach to external communications.
One of the best examples of that shift is investing in a training program that caters to differences in educational approach.
The difference between effective and ineffective training can be successfully mitigating an attack or losing millions of dollars to easily preventable damage.
That damage isn’t speculative — thousands of cyberattacks happen daily. Your organization's approach should be a matter of “when” and not “if.”
Efficient training accounts for different learning styles and the impacts of neurodiversity — generally speaking, the more options and variety, the more successful your program will be.
While educated staff are better at addressing vulnerabilities, there also needs to be a free exchange of information.
As we mentioned, everyone brings different learning styles and observational skills to their lessons. Organizations committed to open information exchange can maximize protection by leveraging that variation to build a robust defense-in-depth security infrastructure.
That’s primarily through building a culture of security awareness, which involves:
Gamifying cyber awareness training through internal competitions, bug bounties, and other incentives can motivate your team to master mitigating issues and keep them engaged.
By creating a culture of cyber awareness and promoting good behavior, you can incentivize people to perform “gut checks,” where they share information about suspected threats with peers.
This collaborative culture encourages employees to identify threats early and often, significantly reducing your risk.
Supplement that identification and awareness with these measures.
You can overcome challenges and take advantage of opportunities to create defensive, in-depth human vulnerability management. Here are some straightforward recommendations to get you started.
Though the list above isn’t comprehensive, it should help you shape a cybersecurity awareness program to build a culture of awareness and harden your organization from social engineering and other vulnerabilities.
Where your systems may not pick up a threat, your people will. Those safeguards will pay dividends in other areas, such as:
Your staff can be an excellent early warning system that identifies problematic behavior and encourages rapid reporting. They will adaptably spot issues quickly and address them effectively if empowered to do so.
Investing in your staff and building a culture of security awareness can pay dividends by averting costly and debilitating cyberattacks. Doing so requires acknowledging the challenges of working with people, who are naturally susceptible to attack and difficult to train.
At Phin Security, we see those challenges as opportunities to maximize security and optimize your operations. Our innovative training platform focuses on changing employee behavior so you can turn your staff into a robust first line of defense.
With our user-friendly platform, you can easily:
Ultimately, while your staff may lack the accuracy of your technical infrastructure, they’re far more adaptable than any machine. That resilience enables them to take a uniquely human approach to addressing threats and mitigating crippling attacks.
We designed our security awareness training and phishing simulation solutions specifically for MSPs, so you can address your company's unique training needs and deliver peace of mind to your clients. Request your free trial today or connect with our team for more information.